Deck Comment by RoninRosko
Most of the courtiers have been takne out simply because they are not that great. Maezawa stays in though as he synergises well with the stronghold. Instead, low cost shugs have been included as they just have better inherent value. Similarly, For Shame is out as it requires a courtier and often nee ...
Deck Comment by Daidoji Hikori
Great write up and answers Chut! Great work!
Inconsistency has been a problem. Before the pack it was conflict that was more inconsistent, now it is the new costlier dynasty side.
Though it seems that we only have to streamline it a bit more.
Deck Comment by Chuterêve
So to answer two questions :
A lot of 1x has different logic in dynasty and conflict. The 1x dynasty was not something i was doing in the past but more a deckbuilding that emerged post Crane clan pack (if you pay attention i am actually not the only one doing that amongst Crane). The logic is that ...
Deck Comment by GWItheUltimate
Good Job
don't listen to A holes that says who only win because you played crane... this game is so deep that this comment is 100% retarded.
Congrats !
Deck Comment by Slyphs
those one you use why aren't they consistent enough to show up when you need them